The Case for AI: Your Manual Contract Review Process is a Liability

By Ryan Wentzel
2 Min. Read
#legal-liability#AI-adoption#standard-of-care#legal-risk#innovation
The Case for AI: Your Manual Contract Review Process is a Liability

Table of Contents

The Uncomfortable Truth

If your firm relies solely on manual contract review in 2025, you're not just inefficient—you're exposed to malpractice liability.

Here's why: When AI tools can achieve 98%+ accuracy and catch issues exhausted associates miss, courts are beginning to ask: "Why didn't you use available technology?"

The Evolving Standard of Care

Traditional standard: What would a reasonably competent attorney do?

Emerging standard: What technology-assisted review methods are available to prevent errors?

Case Law Evolution

Recent decisions suggest courts recognize AI tools as part of expected attorney competence:

Key principle: If technology exists that can prevent foreseeable errors, choosing not to use it may fall below the standard of care.

Analogies:

  • Legal research: Lexis/Westlaw expected, not optional
  • Document review in discovery: Technology-assisted review is standard
  • Contract analysis: AI review becoming expected baseline

The Human Error Problem

Reality: Exhausted attorneys miss critical clauses.

Statistics:

  • Manual review error rate: 8-15%
  • AI-assisted review error rate: 1-4%
  • Cost of missed clause: $100K to $50M+

Malpractice exposure: When a missed clause costs the client millions, "we were working long hours" isn't a defense.

Risk Management Through AI

Best practice: AI-assisted review with attorney oversight provides:

Documentation: Complete analysis trail showing due diligence

Consistency: Same standard applied across all contracts

Comprehensiveness: Every clause analyzed, nothing skipped due to fatigue

Defensibility: If issue missed, you can demonstrate sophisticated tools were used and attorney judgment applied

What's Next?

AI adoption isn't optional—it's risk management. But how do you centralize contract intelligence across the firm?


Continue the Series:

#legalLiability #AIadoption #standardOfCare #legalRisk #innovation

#legalLiability #AIadoption #standardOfCare #legalRisk #innovation

Share Your Thoughts

Found this article helpful? Share it with your network.

Get in Touch
Ryan Wentzel

About Ryan Wentzel

Ryan previously served as a PCI Professional Forensic Investigator (PFI) of record for 3 of the top 10 largest data breaches in history. With over two decades of experience in cybersecurity, digital forensics, and executive leadership, he has served Fortune 500 companies and government agencies worldwide.